[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [eLyXer-users] Excluding the build directory from the tarball?
From: |
Sven Hoexter |
Subject: |
Re: [eLyXer-users] Excluding the build directory from the tarball? |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:05:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 08:42:16PM +0100, Alex Fernandez wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Sven Hoexter <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > would it be possible to excluded the 'build' directory from the release
> > tarball?
>
> Sure, no problem. I have just committed a version of your patch that
> removes the build directory from the .tar.gz, and also from the .zip.
Thanks.
> Git rocks, truth be told. It is an amazing tool.
:)
At least for people like me, who don't use it on a daily basis, it still
has a steep learning curve. But I'm getting better and the svn to git
conversion was a good educational excercise.
> I would not like 0.36 to propagate to testing since it has an annoying
> bug with unordered sections -- just look at the main page:
> http://www.nongnu.org/elyxer/
> and see how the sections are <h?> because of a silly bug. But in
> unstable more people can try it out and find any remaining bugs. We
> have more than 20 users now! With the improved TOC generation code I
> expect it should reach a wider audience.
Uh ugly. Do you have a fix for that at hand? Since I've not yet uploaded the
package I'd rather like to get a fix for it included instead of knowingly
upload a broken package.
Sven
--
If God passed a mic to me to speak
I'd say stay in bed, world
Sleep in peace
[The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]