[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#4743: closed (fundamental mode not sufficiently fundamental yet)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:52:30 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#4743: fundamental mode not sufficiently fundamental yet
has caused the GNU bug report #4743,
regarding fundamental mode not sufficiently fundamental yet
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
4743: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4743
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> fundamental mode not sufficiently fundamental yet
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:52:24 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090923 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4
>
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> If I press [tab] in fundamental mode, then emacs doesn't jump to the
> next tab, but to the position of the next non-space char of the
> previous line. Sometimes this is really annoying.
>
>
> According to the documentation this cannot be switched off:
>
> "The least specialized major mode is called "Fundamental mode".  This
> mode has no mode-specific redefinitions or variable settings, so that
> each Emacs command behaves in its most general manner, and each option
> is in its default state."
>
>
> Would it be possible to introduce some kind of "raw fundamental mode",
> telling Emacs to not look at the indentation on other lines?
>
>
> Regards
>
> Harri
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#4743: fundamental mode not sufficiently fundamental yet
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:52:30 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> I don't see a need to keep open this particular report, which was marked
> "wontfix" some time ago.
>
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> > "Fundamental" just means "using all global, default values".  It does
> > not necessarily mean "no bells and whistles".
>
>
> --- End Message ---