[debbugs-tracker] bug#12720: closed (24.2.50; Update or remove MS Windows FAQ)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:08:23 +0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#12720: 24.2.50; Update or remove MS Windows FAQ
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12720,
regarding 24.2.50; Update or remove MS Windows FAQ
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
12720: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12720
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.2.50; Update or remove MS Windows FAQ
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:36:55 +0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;	rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
>
>
>
>
> This one: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/
>
> I reported a problem with it to the mailing list:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-emacs-windows/2012-10/msg00027.html
> and Eli expressed preference for that FAQ to disappear altogether.
>
> If the FAQ is removed, I'd like to see the contents of the
> section 7.3 moved somewhere else.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#12720: 24.2.50; Update or remove MS Windows FAQ
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:08:23 +0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;	rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
>
>
>
>
> On 24.10.2012 21:37, Glenn Morris wrote:
> > Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> >
> > > This one: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/
> > >
> > > I reported a problem with it to the mailing list:
> >
> > In case you did not know, anyone who can commit to the Emacs code
> > repository can edit the web-site. So you can fix this yourself!
> >
> > Follow the instructions at
> >
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=emacs
> >
> > Basically:
> > export CVS_RSH=ssh
> > cvs -z3 -d:ext:<membername>@cvs.savannah.gnu.org:/web/emacs co emacs
> >
> > Changes go live more-or-less immediately.
>
> Thanks, fixed. Although, I must say, using a centralized VCS with a 
> server as slow as this one is an exercise in patience.
>
> I also expected someone to choose between "fix" and "remove", but this 
> can obviously wait now.
>
> --Dmitry
>
>
> --- End Message ---