--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
24.3.50; mention recent change of `kbd' to a function in NEWS |
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Dec 2012 16:28:01 -0800 |
1. Subject line says it all.
2. Also, I don't recall (and cannot seem to find) any discussion of this
in address@hidden I have no objection to the change, but I'm
curious: what was the reason? Is there something new, or was it just so
you can funcall it etc.?
3. (put 'kbd 'pure t)
What does putting non-nil property `pure' on a function symbol do? Does
it mean that the definition will stored in pure storage? How about
documenting this `pure' property? For example (assuming it is
appropriate), in (elisp) `Pure Storage'.
In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2012-11-19 on MS-W7-DANI
Bzr revision: 110950 address@hidden
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
`configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
-Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/src
-Ic:/emacs/libs/libpng-1.2.37-lib/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/zlib-1.2.5
-Ic:/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1-lib/include
-Ic:/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4-lib/include
-Ic:/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1-lib/include
-Ic:/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2
-Ic:/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9-w32-bin/include
-Ic:/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.9.2-1-lib/include'
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#13052: 24.3.50; mention recent change of `kbd' to a function in NEWS |
|
Date: |
Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:14:41 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) |
"Drew Adams" <address@hidden> writes:
> 1. Subject line says it all.
Fixed, thanks.
As for the `pure' property, it's now mentioned in the Lisp manual.
--- End Message ---