--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:04:39 +0900 |
X-Debbugs-Cc: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>,Noam Postavsky
<address@hidden>,Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,address@hidden
It might be argued that a hidden string is more legible when using
?* as the hidden character instead of ?.
For example, the following strings have the same length:
"......"
"******"
Following patch uses ?* as default character to hide passwords instead
of ?.
--8<-----------------------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
commit 6b5c3db59650590d9db24ef110b972019b24e03a
Author: Tino Calancha <address@hidden>
Date: Fri Jul 20 16:58:33 2018 +0900
Prefer ?* to hide passwords
It might be argued that a hidden string is more legible when using
?* as the hidden character instead of ?.
For example, the following strings have the same length:
"......"
"******"
It's slighly easier to visually count the number of characters in the second
string (Bug#32220).
* lisp/subr.el (read-passwd): Prefer ?* as default char instead of ?.
* doc/lispref/minibuf.texi (Reading a Password): Update manual.
; * etc/NEWS (Changes in Emacs 27.1): Announce the change.
diff --git a/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi b/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi
index 889b64af8a..d091787a68 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi
@@ -2199,7 +2199,7 @@ Reading a Password
@defun read-passwd prompt &optional confirm default
This function reads a password, prompting with @var{prompt}. It does
not echo the password as the user types it; instead, it echoes
address@hidden for each character in the password. If you want to apply
address@hidden for each character in the password. If you want to apply
another character to hide the password, let-bind the variable
@code{read-hide-char} with that character.
diff --git a/etc/NEWS b/etc/NEWS
index 8275cbb72c..f21da91a4b 100644
--- a/etc/NEWS
+++ b/etc/NEWS
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ work right without some adjustment:
* Changes in Emacs 27.1
++++
+** The function 'read-passwd' uses '*' as default character to hide passwords.
+
---
** New variable 'xft-ignore-color-fonts'.
Default t means don't try to load color fonts when using Xft, as they
diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
index 10343e69db..59a6209af3 100644
--- a/lisp/subr.el
+++ b/lisp/subr.el
@@ -2305,7 +2305,7 @@ read-passwd
If optional CONFIRM is non-nil, read the password twice to make sure.
Optional DEFAULT is a default password to use instead of empty input.
-This function echoes `.' for each character that the user types.
+This function echoes `*' for each character that the user types.
You could let-bind `read-hide-char' to another hiding character, though.
Once the caller uses the password, it can erase the password
@@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ read-passwd
beg)))
(dotimes (i (- end beg))
(put-text-property (+ i beg) (+ 1 i beg)
- 'display (string (or read-hide-char ?.))))))
+ 'display (string (or read-hide-char ?*))))))
minibuf)
(minibuffer-with-setup-hook
(lambda ()
@@ -2346,7 +2346,7 @@ read-passwd
(add-hook 'after-change-functions hide-chars-fun nil 'local))
(unwind-protect
(let ((enable-recursive-minibuffers t)
- (read-hide-char (or read-hide-char ?.)))
+ (read-hide-char (or read-hide-char ?*)))
(read-string prompt nil t default)) ; t = "no history"
(when (buffer-live-p minibuf)
(with-current-buffer minibuf
--8<-----------------------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 18, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11)
of 2018-07-20
Repository revision: fb24ce37d1bc258cfc3884d9828aa0602fa06e1d
Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11902000
System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#32220: 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jul 2018 21:25:35 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Tino Calancha <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:31:08 +0900
>>
>> Eli, which branch is suitable for this patch? Next release or master?
>
> Master, I think.
Thank you.
Pushed into the master branch as commit 'Prefer ?* to hide passwords'
(b3f7e73fb76a366dc644ee2e6b9f4897c17d201d)
--- End Message ---