[debbugs-tracker] bug#32840: closed (linux-libre 4.18.9: shpchp is no longer a module (now: built-in))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:24:09 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#32840: linux-libre 4.18.9: shpchp is no longer a 
module (now: built-in)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32840,
regarding linux-libre 4.18.9: shpchp is no longer a module (now: built-in)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
32840: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32840
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> linux-libre 4.18.9: shpchp is no longer a module (now: built-in)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:57:20 +0000
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> at taler we need shpchp as a module in the initrd.
>
> Before version 4.18.x, shpchp was a module we've build in guix' linux-libre,
> you were able to just specify it for the initrd.
>
> With 4.18.9, this module became a compile-in/built-in (see linux
> commit log).  I want to avoid maintaining yet another kernel
> definition for future complications if I can.  Can we get this module
> built in by default?
>
> I consider it a bug as the functionality was given before and
> disappeared now, leaving our system unable to upgrade unless I write
> some code around it.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#32840: linux-libre 4.18.9: shpchp is no longer a module (now: built-in)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 25 Sep 2018 23:24:09 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > at taler we need shpchp as a module in the initrd.
> >
> > Before version 4.18.x, shpchp was a module we've build in guix' linux-libre,
> > you were able to just specify it for the initrd.
> >
> > With 4.18.9, this module became a compile-in/built-in (see linux
> > commit log).  I want to avoid maintaining yet another kernel
> > definition for future complications if I can.  Can we get this module
> > built in by default?
>
> Done in commit fe73352e8073ea0a0e6f6b5591f24395671998ab on master.
> Closing this bug now, but please reopen if appropriate.
>
>      Thanks!
>        Mark
>
>
> --- End Message ---