[debbugs-tracker] bug#34079: closed ([PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs))

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:49:02 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse 
-> sshfs)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34079,
regarding [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
34079: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34079
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:12:52 +0100
>
>
>
>
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> >> I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep
> >> a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has
> >> been renamed.
> >
> > Right. See the definition of 'letsencrypt' in (gnu packages tls) for an
> > example of this.
>
> Done.
>
> >From 86536694d40eb42e746b55cac5caa98e28946ed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: swedebugia <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:03:20 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Rename sshfs-fuse to sshfs.
>
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm
>   (sshfs-fuse): Mark as superseeded.
>   (sshfs): New variable.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/linux.scm | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> index 4fb85f2f3..4b70694d2 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
> @@ -1810,9 +1810,9 @@ UnionFS-FUSE additionally supports copy-on-write.")
>                 #t))))))
>      (inputs `(("fuse" ,fuse-static)))))
>  
> -(define-public sshfs-fuse
> +(define-public sshfs
>    (package
> -    (name "sshfs-fuse")
> +    (name "sshfs")
>      (version "2.10")
>      (source (origin
>                (method url-fetch)
> @@ -1837,6 +1837,11 @@ up: on the server side there's nothing to do; on the 
> client side mounting the
>  file system is as easy as logging into the server with an SSH client.")
>      (license license:gpl2+)))
>  
> +(define-public sshfs-fuse
> +  (package (inherit sshfs)
> +    (name "sshfs-fuse")
> +    (properties `((superseded . ,sshfs)))))
> +
>  (define-public archivemount
>    (package
>      (name "archivemount")
> -- 
> 2.19.2
>
>
> --- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:49:02 -0500 User-agent: Mutt/1.11.0 (2018-11-25)

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 09:12:52PM +0100, swedebugia wrote:
> From 86536694d40eb42e746b55cac5caa98e28946ed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: swedebugia <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:03:20 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Rename sshfs-fuse to sshfs.

Thanks!

> * gnu/packages/linux.scm
>   (sshfs-fuse): Mark as superseeded.
>   (sshfs): New variable.

I edited this commit message and pushed as
357b9f9d71464180ca78f58abf3a2810ccb589f3

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---