emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#34052: closed (27.0.50; New command gnus-summary-p


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#34052: closed (27.0.50; New command gnus-summary-press-button)
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 17:08:02 +0000

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:07:08 -0700
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#34052: Acknowledgement (27.0.50; New command 
gnus-summary-press-button)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34052,
regarding 27.0.50; New command gnus-summary-press-button
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
34052: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34052
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 27.0.50; New command gnus-summary-press-button Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 13:59:01 -0800
The attached patch adds a new Gnus summary buffer command, that clicks a
link in the article buffer. Technically, it calls `widget-button-press'
on one of the widgets in the article buffer, offering completion if
there's more than one. I'm not sure I've handled all the possible values
of the 'gnus-data text property, but more would be easy to add.

Basically this just lets you follow a link without actually moving point
or the mouse into the article buffer.

Attachment: 0001-New-command-gnus-summary-press-button.patch
Description: Text Data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#34052: Acknowledgement (27.0.50; New command gnus-summary-press-button) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:07:08 -0700 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Yeah, I'm just viewing the plain text. We'll want to support both plain
>> and html versions, so I think scanning for both properties is still
>> desirable. 
>
> Oh, yeah, plain text...
>
>> What do you think about just dropping scheme-less URLs?
>
> Yup; sounds good.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]