[debbugs-tracker] bug#34373: closed (26.1; Missing range check in rx-submatch-n)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:34:07 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#34373: Acknowledgement (26.1; Missing range check in 
rx-submatch-n)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #34373,
regarding 26.1; Missing range check in rx-submatch-n
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
34373: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34373
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 26.1; Missing range check in rx-submatch-n
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 7 Feb 2019 19:01:33 +0100
>
>
>
>
> `rx' should protect its own abstractions and never generate an invalid regexp, 
> but will if given a bad submatch number:
>
> (rx (group-n 0 "x"))
> => "\\(?0:x\\)"
>
> It's a missing range check in rx-submatch-n.
>
> In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0, NS appkit-1348.17 
> Version 10.10.5 (Build 14F2511))
>  of 2018-05-31 built on builder10-10.porkrind.org
> Windowing system distributor 'Apple', version 10.3.1671
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#34373: Acknowledgement (26.1; Missing range check in rx-submatch-n)
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:34:07 +0200
>
>
>
>
> 23 juni 2019 kl. 20.20 skrev Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>:
> > 
> > This looks like an eminently reasonable sanity check to me, but I'm
> > quite unfamiliar with the rx machinery.  Just push the change?
>
> Thank you, pushed.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---