[debbugs-tracker] bug#36064: closed ([PATCH] sawfish.scm - update sawfish to 1.12)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:28:13 +0530
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#36064] [PATCH] sawfish.scm - update sawfish to 1.12
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36064,
regarding [PATCH] sawfish.scm - update sawfish to 1.12
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
36064: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36064
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] sawfish.scm - update sawfish to 1.12 Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 17:35:40 -0600 User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.2

0001-update-sawfish-to-1.12.patch
Description: Text Data

-- 
Dr Benjamin Slade - https://slade.jnanam.net / https://babbagefiles.xyz
  `(pgp_fp: ,(21BA 2AE1 28F6 DF36 110A 0E9C A320 BBE8 2B52 EE19))
    '(sent by mu4e on Emacs running under GNU/Linux . https://gnu.org )

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#36064] [PATCH] sawfish.scm - update sawfish to 1.12 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:28:13 +0530

> 0.90.8.3 isn't packaged for distribution though, so it may be
> beta-ish. In any case, I don't know how to get it to build, given that
> it's not packaged for distribution at this point.

The sawfish website lists 0.90.8.3 as current. So, I think we should
update. I did this, and pushed my changes to master.

> Effectively, then, I'm just updating `sawfish` itself, given the lack of
> a need for the comments I had made about versions, so I'll resubmit a
> patch just updating the sawfish package.

I edited your earlier patch to only update sawfish, and pushed it to
master.

Thanks!

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---