[debbugs-tracker] bug#36562: closed (downgrading ghc-ansi-terminal)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:58:56 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#36562] downgrading ghc-ansi-terminal
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36562,
regarding downgrading  ghc-ansi-terminal
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
36562: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36562
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> downgrading  ghc-ansi-terminal
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:51:33 +0200
>
>
>
>
> A patch set to downgrade ghc-ansi-terminal to the stackage LTS
> version, to have a consistent package set. This also downgrades
> the recently added ghc-validation to version 1 from version 1.1.
>
> The problem with the current situation is that we have some
> packages depending on the updated ghc-ansi-terminal 0.9, and
> some depending on ghc-ansi-terminal 0.8. By themselves, they
> compile, but it’s now impossible to package modules that depend
> directly on packages from both sets.
>
> @Jacob: Would ghc-validation version 1 be sufficient for you
> purposes?
>
> Cheers
> Robert
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#36562] downgrading ghc-ansi-terminal
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:58:56 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Jacob MacDonald <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> I’ve CC’ed Jacob on this message since they may not be subscribed to the
> >> list.
> >
> > That is indeed the case.
> >
> >>> @Jacob: Would ghc-validation version 1 be sufficient for you
> >>> purposes?
> >
> > Glancing at the changelog, it should be. If not, I'll use a custom
> > package definition. My use-case is low severity anyway.
>
> Okay.  Thanks Jacob!
>
> I reordered these a bit so that ansi-terminal and its dependencies get
> changed in a single commit.  I also split off the removal of the
> “Setup.hs” generating phase into its own commit.
>
> They are (finally!) pushed as 1c54c30d9c–91732735f6.
>
>
> -- Tim
>
>
> --- End Message ---