[debbugs-tracker] bug#36708: closed (guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:11:54 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#36708: Serving an up-to-date 
https://guix.gnu.org/packages
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36708,
regarding guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
36708: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36708
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> guix.gnu.org/packages is 6 weeks stale, claims recent update
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 17 Jul 2019 14:50:20 -0400
>
>
>
>
> As I write this, <https://guix.gnu.org/packages/> is over 6 weeks stale,
> but claims to have been updated two days ago, on July 15:
>
>   "GNU Guix provides 9,789 packages transparently available as pre-built
>   binaries. These pages provide a complete list of the packages. Our
>   continuous integration system shows their current build status
>   (updated July 15, 2019)."
>
> The same site shows the latest 'linux-libre' package to be 5.1.5:
>
>   https://guix.gnu.org/packages/L/page/5/
>
> In fact, 'linux-libre' was updated to 5.1.6 early on June 1st:
>
>   
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=b6cf7e54ea412ed24e6b3ca55a5b452a70ec957f
>
>       Mark
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#36708: Serving an up-to-date https://guix.gnu.org/packages
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 22 Aug 2019 17:11:54 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> skribis:
> >
> >>    The package list at <https://guix.gnu.org/packages> is made from the
> >>    current ‘guix’ package, not from the latest ‘master’.  We should
> >>    work to build it dynamically with something like hpcguix-web, or to
> >>    generate it from an inferior of ‘master’.
> >
> > I went for the latter option in commit
> > 9dbb0073be83c25b44400a62ec22d0b240a88130 of guix-artwork.git.
> >
> > That approach was also motivated by the fact that people would get
> > different behavior depending on whether their ‘guix’ package depends on
> > guile-json@1 or @3, as reported by nixo on IRC.
> >
> > That’s also the reason why the web site was no longer updated since
> > 9c6f714305460e99c681d9b7f368e13bfe49fdd9 was pushed: the ‘guix’ on
> > berlin is still on guile-json@1, but said commit expects guile-json@3.
> >
> > If everything goes well, we should see an up-to-date list at
> > <https://guix.gnu.org/packages> within 40 minutes.
>
> Looks good to me.  I'm closing this bug now.
>
>    Thank you! :)
>       Mark
>
>
> --- End Message ---