bug#39332: closed ([PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:21:45 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [bug#39332] [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to 
%BASE-PACKAGES.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #39332,
regarding [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
39332: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39332
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:26:51 -0500
>
>
>
>
> * gnu/system.scm (%base-packages): Add btrfs-progs.
> ---
>  gnu/system.scm | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/system.scm b/gnu/system.scm
> index 01baa248a2..7cb6bef99d 100644
> --- a/gnu/system.scm
> +++ b/gnu/system.scm
> @@ -586,7 +586,8 @@ of PROVENANCE-SERVICE-TYPE to its services."
>           ;; already depends on it anyway.
>           kmod eudev
>  
> -         e2fsprogs kbd
> +         btrfs-progs e2fsprogs
> +         kbd
>  
>           bash-completion
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.0
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#39332] [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 7 Feb 2020 19:21:45 -0500
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:19:18AM +0000, Brice Waegeneire wrote:
> > On 2020-01-28 23:14, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote:
> > > > This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of
> > > > 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need
> > > > btrfs
> > > > support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart
> > > > from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's just
> > > me. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding.
> > 
> > Maybe %base-packages is the wrong place to add it. But it should at least be
> > added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses btrfs which isn't
> > the case as I recall.
>
> You're right, that's a much better idea!
>
>
> --- End Message ---