bug#41282: closed (doc: dot graphs display square glyphs instead of letters)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:39 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: [PATCH] gnu: fontconfig: Add replacement with font-dejavu 
instead of gs-fonts.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #41282,
regarding doc: dot graphs display square glyphs instead of letters
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden.)


-- 
41282: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41282
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: doc: dot graphs display square glyphs instead of letters Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:23:33 +0200

See for instance "12.1 The Reduced Binary Seed Bootstrap".
Commit 7bba5425473b5d193946e537de77c631ae6c3667.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: fontconfig: Add replacement with font-dejavu instead of gs-fonts. Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 00:00:39 +0200 User-agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 04:50:12PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> This is a hack to make (some) fonts working when users don't have fonts
>> specified in their system configuration, and (crucially) places where
>> the fontconfig cache may be unavailable such as 'guix pack's.
>> 
>> I'm not sure whether font-dejavu is a good replacement here.  Another
>> approach could be to convert gs-fonts to TrueType or OpenType format.
>> 
>> Thoughts?  I don't know much about fonts and would appreciate feedback.
>
> I think you should push right away, assuming that it helps and doesn't
> rebuild the world.

I pushed the patch as ab9de8cfb0525ef43668712ac898707f97f9a620.

I verified that it fixes the immediate problem with fonts in the Guix
manual (#41282) as well as 'guix pack' (#41344).  It should also provide
a decent fallback for cases where the user did not explicitly install
any fonts such as in #41241.

Hoping for angry reports now about why such a poor replacement font was
chosen.  ;-)

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---