[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#41688: closed ([PATCH] Add rsyslog)
From: |
GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: |
bug#41688: closed ([PATCH] Add rsyslog) |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 09:27:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:22:11 +0100
with message-id <87fsq9gm66.fsf@elephly.net>
and subject line [PATCH] Add rsyslog
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #41688,
regarding [PATCH] Add rsyslog
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)
--
41688: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41688
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Add rsyslog |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:29:57 -0500 |
0001-gnu-Add-libestr.patch
Description: Text Data
0005-gnu-Add-rsyslog.patch
Description: Text Data
0004-gnu-Add-liblognorm.patch
Description: Text Data
0002-gnu-Add-libfastjson.patch
Description: Text Data
0003-gnu-Add-liblogging.patch
Description: Text Data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
[PATCH] Add rsyslog |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Dec 2021 10:22:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 |
Hi,
I’ve followed Ludo’s suggestions for the remaining package definitions
and pushed the result to the “master” branch.
Among the changes:
- fixed and clarified licenses
- removed per-module outputs
- removed default configure flags and added a comment about enabling
optional features
- enabled tests
- removed “dev” output
- used new input style
Now I guess we’ll need an rsyslog service :)
Thank you, Katherine, for the patches and your patience!
--
Ricardo
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#41688: closed ([PATCH] Add rsyslog),
GNU bug Tracking System <=