bug#53049: closed ([PATCH] gnu: libaio: Fix cross-compilation.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jan 2022 23:14:03 +0100
with message-id <87lezp27hy.fsf@nckx>
and subject line Re: [bug#53049] [PATCH] gnu: libaio: Fix cross-compilation.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53049,
regarding [PATCH] gnu: libaio: Fix cross-compilation.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
53049: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53049
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libaio: Fix cross-compilation. Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:30:30 +0100

Hi Guix!

I saw a message on the unofficial #guix:matrix.org room about libaio
failing to build. Indeed, it uses %output and that doesn't exist in
cross-compilation context anymore. Here's a small patch to fix that. I
had to be careful not to change the package outside of
cross-compilation, since it has >5000 dependents, hence the ,(if ...)
statement.

0001-gnu-libaio-Fix-cross-compilation.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [bug#53049] [PATCH] gnu: libaio: Fix cross-compilation. Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 23:14:03 +0100

Hi,

Julien Lepiller wrote:

Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libaio: Fix cross-compilation.

I pushed a series of cross-compilation fixes yesterday night to fix the pinebook-pro image build ASAP.

It was pretty bad: there was no valid CI build, so the guix.gnu.org ‘Download’ was just… broken. I didn't notice your patch.

Mine looks slightly different (preferring as I do shiny gexps, and trying to move away from %output{s,} :-) but the thrust is the same, comment included.

Thanks! and closing,

T G-R

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---