--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[PATCH 0/2] Not showing upgraded/added packages in 'guix pull' |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:38:38 +0100 |
Hello!
As a followup to <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/53909>, these patches
remove the list of added/upgraded packages from the output of
‘guix pull’ (upon completion) and ‘guix pull --news’.
It’s not spring yet in this hemisphere, but it looks like a spring cleanup!
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès (2):
pull: '--news' no longer shows package lists.
pull: No longer print upgraded/added packages upon completion.
doc/guix.texi | 10 ++---
guix/scripts/pull.scm | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
base-commit: 41000d16c5c1586482a76d856c3152a6b8fcce8a
--
2.34.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#54000: [PATCH 0/2] Not showing upgraded/added packages in 'guix pull' |
|
Date: |
Sun, 27 Feb 2022 23:15:27 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@ist.tugraz.at> skribis:
> Am Freitag, dem 18.02.2022 um 10:08 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Hey comrades, hold your horses! :-)
>>
>> Since there’s a need for this, we can make ‘--details’ print package
>> lists when combined with ‘--news’; it doesn’t cost us anything,
>> that’s OK.
> Regarding the issue simon raised w.r.t. --details implying -l, I think
> --details should only imply listing the latest generation if -l is not
> specified. That way --news --details would (hopefully) work as I
> intended, and specifying one without the other would only print that
> part.
Right, I went with something like you describe:
2ddfb7b99b pull: No longer print upgraded/added packages upon completion.
bc8bea1739 pull: '--news' no longer shows package lists.
That is, one can run ‘guix pull -N --details’ and get what you asked
for. Running ‘guix pull --details’ alone still implies ‘-l’.
Let me know if anything’s amiss.
> On a separate note, would/should guix describe be affected by this?
> Its output appear currently the same as `guix pull -l
> $CURRENT_GENERATION', but I haven't tested this on a generation
> including news. My guess would be "no" as guix describe currently
> doesn't accept --news.
No, ‘guix describe’ doesn’t display news, profile changes, and all
that. It’s meant to just show the raw channel info.
Thanks to both of you for your feedback!
Ludo’.
--- End Message ---