bug#52347: closed (Shell: error when -m manifest is removed)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:04:54 -0500
with message-id <874k4gjvqx.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used 
with '--'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53892,
regarding Shell: error when -m manifest is removed
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
53892: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53892
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Shell: error when -m manifest is removed
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:33:35 +0100
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 28.0.60
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi guix,
>
>  Using latest guix, and considering a local manifest.scm file 
>  with only
>
>    (specifications->manifest (list "python"))
>
>  Following command works
>
>    guix shell --container -m manifest.scm -- python3
>
>  But
>
>    guix shell --container -- python3
>
> gives an error. However,
>
>    guix shell --container
>
> followed by
>
>    python3
>
> works.
>
>  So, by just removing the ’-m manifest.scm’ flag, I get an error.
>
> Regards,
>
> Cayetano Santos
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:04:54 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> tags 53892 notabug
> --
>
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz> skribis:
> >
> >> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> >>> $ guix shell -C -- make
> >>> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
> >>> guix shell: error: make: command not found
> >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> >>>
> >>> The last command exhibit the problem.
> >>
> >> I believe this is [1].
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18
> >
> > Should we close as “notabug”?
>
> That seems reasonable; and I see it's already documented as such.
>
> Good for me!  Thanks for pointing it out.
>
> Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---