emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#55158: closed (bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct encoding/ut


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#55158: closed (bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct encoding/utf-8)
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 21:33:01 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2022 17:32:13 -0400
with message-id <87r13yj0yq.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#55158: bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct 
encoding/utf-8
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #55158,
regarding bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct encoding/utf-8
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
55158: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55158
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct encoding/utf-8 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 18:22:34 -0600
The output of mu [ <https://guix.gnu.org/en/packages/mu-1.6.10/> ] (and thus, 
by extension, mu4e in Emacs) does not correctly handle characters outside of a 
certain range (which confuses Emacs to no end). This behaviour occurs both in 
mu4e and when using mu on the commandline.

For instance, subject lines including the 🎉 emoji ("celebration") do not show 
the emoji, but rather a backslashed \360. Similar issues occur with, for 
instance, devanagari characters (Hindi etc.).

When using mu/mu4e on non-Guix systems, this issue does not occur. (I.e. both 
in mu4e and in mu on the commandline these characters are correctly displayed.)

Since mu depends on xapian, it's possible the issue could also be with Guix's 
xapian package.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#55158: bug: mu/mu4e on Guix does not use correct encoding/utf-8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 17:32:13 -0400 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
Hi,

Benjamin Slade <slade@lambda-y.net> writes:

> Update: So the encoding issue seems to be at a "lower level" than mu
> in fact. I noticed that new messages come through with the correct
> encoding now, so I assume it was an (odd) issue of locale settings
> when I initialised the mail initially/copied over old messages.
>
> (Unfortunately there does not seem to be a great way to mass re-encode 
> messages. I can use `iconv' to convert, but it fails on messages with 
> attachments, I think.)

OK.  I'm glad you could figure it out at least to some degrees :-).

I'll close the report but if it becomes a problem again feel free to
reopen it, with a reproducer ideally.

Thanks,

Maxim


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]