bug#36992: closed (linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on armhf and aarch64; why?)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2022 21:07:09 -0400
with message-id <874k0tgwci.fsf@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#36992: linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on armhf and 
aarch64; why?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #36992,
regarding linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on armhf and aarch64; why?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
36992: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36992
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on armhf and aarch64; why?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 09 Aug 2019 14:46:38 -0400
>
>
>
>
> linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on Berlin due to a dependency failure:
>
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=linux-libre-5
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556871/details
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556831/details
>
> I guess that the deblobbing derivation probably failed, but I don't see
> a way to confirm this, or to find out what specifically went wrong.
>
> Specifically, I'd like to know:
>
> (1) Which derivations failed, that caused these dependency failures?
> (2) Were the failed build logs saved, and if so, how can I see them?
> (3) Did the failed derivations time out, or was it another kind of failure?
>
> Can someone help me find out what's going on here?
>
>      Thanks,
>        Mark
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#36992: linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on armhf and aarch64; why?
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 09 Jun 2022 21:07:09 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> >> linux-libre-5.2.7 failed to build on Berlin due to a dependency failure:
> >>
> >>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=linux-libre-5
> >>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556871/details
> >>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1556831/details
> >>
> >> I guess that the deblobbing derivation probably failed, but I don't see
> >> a way to confirm this, or to find out what specifically went wrong.
> >>
> >> Specifically, I'd like to know:
> >>
> >> (1) Which derivations failed, that caused these dependency failures?
>
> Cuirass has evolved a lot since; then. It's now possible to follow the
> chain of failed dependency and the logs should be saved.
>
> Closing.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maxim
>
>
> --- End Message ---