bug#55946: closed (29.0.50; minibuffer-mode lacks an abbrev table)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:38:43 -0500
with message-id <87ilp3m3wc.fsf@melete.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: bug#55946: 29.0.50; minibuffer-mode lacks an abbrev table
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #55946,
regarding 29.0.50; minibuffer-mode lacks an abbrev table
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
55946: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=55946
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 29.0.50; minibuffer-mode lacks an abbrev table
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:38:43 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Notmuch/0.36 Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to define an abbrev for minibuffer-mode but it doesn't have an
> abbrev table.  There's a comment in minibuffer.el saying that this is
> because abbrev.el is not loaded early enough.  It would be useful to
> have the abbrev table for this mode too.
>
> -- 
> Sean Whitton
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#55946: 29.0.50; minibuffer-mode lacks an abbrev table
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 14 Jun 2022 14:38:43 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Notmuch/0.36 Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 13 Jun 2022 at 09:40PM -04, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> >>> I couldn't find the corresponding patch, so I don't know what to say.
> >> Just the attached simple change.
> >
> > Looks fine to me, thanks,
>
> Thanks, pushed.  I don't believe this needs a NEWS entry, but happy to
> write one if others thing otherwise.
>
> -- 
> Sean Whitton
>
>
> --- End Message ---