bug#58940: closed ([PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Add more font lock faces)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:06:01 +0200
with message-id <831qqbrrvq.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#58940: [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Add more font lock 
faces
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #58940,
regarding [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Add more font lock faces
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
58940: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=58940
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Add more font lock faces Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 01:21:03 +0000

The attached patch adds the following faces:

• font-lock-escape-face
• font-lock-number-face
• font-lock-operator-face
• font-lock-property-face
• font-lock-punctuation-face

font-lock-property-face inherits font-lock-variable-name-face which matches the behaviour of cc-mode and python-mode.

font-lock-escape-face inherits nothing. In python-mode, it inherits font-lock-constant-face, but not in cc-mode. Do we want it to inherit anything?

Hopefully I put everything in the right place.

0001-Add-more-font-lock-faces.patch
Description: Text Data

--- End Message ---

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#58940: [PATCH] feature/tree-sitter: Add more font lock faces
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 10 Nov 2022 13:06:01 +0200
>
>
>
>
> > From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 19:59:30 -0800
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> >  58940@debbugs.gnu.org
> > 
> > > Yuan, any further comments? If not, would you or someone else be able to 
> > > push the patch?
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > I don’t have much to say, since this is not really about tree-sitter. I’ll 
> > wait for other folks to decide & push ;-)
>
> I installed it, thanks.
>
>
> --- End Message ---