bug#62570: closed ([PATCH 0/6] Fix name and dependencies of a few Texlive packages)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:30:57 +0200
with message-id <87y1mpjp0u.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: [bug#62570] [PATCH 3/6] gnu: texlive-latex-bigfoot: 
Replace with texlive-bigfoot.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #62570,
regarding [PATCH 0/6] Fix name and dependencies of a few Texlive packages
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
62570: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=62570
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH 0/6] Fix name and dependencies of a few Texlive packages
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 31 Mar 2023 17:30:41 +0200
>
>
>
>
> This patch set normalizes naming scheme of a few Texlive packages, build them 
> from source and set appropriate dependencies.
>
> Nicolas Goaziou (6):
>   gnu: Add texlive-ncctools.
>   gnu: Add texlive-relsize.
>   gnu: texlive-latex-bigfoot: Replace with texlive-bigfoot.
>   gnu: texlive-latex-acronym: Replace with texlive-acronym.
>   gnu: texlive-latex-totcount: Replace with texlive-totcount.
>   gnu: texlive-latex-lastpage: Replace with texlive-lastpage.
>
>  gnu/packages/tex.scm | 328 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 244 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 65afc8fa44051da2c5acaa230af74fa0a99cbbd5
> -- 
> 2.39.2
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: [bug#62570] [PATCH 3/6] gnu: texlive-latex-bigfoot: Replace with texlive-bigfoot.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:30:57 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
> > So, do we (not only the two of us, obviously) agree on the
> > `simple-texlive-package' approach? If so, what should we do about
> > "source"?
>
> I applied the whole set. The question above is still open, but I'm
> closing this particular report for now.
>
> Thank you for your input.
>
> Regards,
> -- 
> Nicolas Goaziou
>
>
> --- End Message ---