emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#63318: closed (Variable ediff-auto-refine doesn't always default to


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#63318: closed (Variable ediff-auto-refine doesn't always default to "on")
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 14:03:02 +0000

Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 17:02:14 +0300
with message-id <83o7mo9vo9.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#63318: Variable ediff-auto-refine doesn't always 
default to "on"
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #63318,
regarding Variable ediff-auto-refine doesn't always default to "on"
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
63318: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63318
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Variable ediff-auto-refine doesn't always default to "on" Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 21:21:50 +0100 (BST)
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Document that variable ediff-auto-refine doesn't always default to "on".

--
Peter Oliver

Attachment: 0001-Variable-ediff-auto-refine-doesn-t-always-default-to.patch
Description: Text document


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#63318: Variable ediff-auto-refine doesn't always default to "on" Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 17:02:14 +0300
> Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 11:26:47 +0100 (BST)
> From: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.org.uk>
> cc: 63318@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > Why doesn't Ediff turn on ediff-auto-refine for all terminals?
> > AFAICT, it only needs faces (basically, colors), and we support that
> > on all terminals nowadays?  So I think we should simply change the
> > default value (which will also solve bug#63317).  Or what am I
> > missing?
> 
> I assumed that this complication was present because there exist displays on 
> which auto-refinement isn’t desirable.
> 
> If that’s no-longer the case, then great, simplifying the default to always 
> be “on” certainly sounds like the best way to go to me.  Attached is a patch 
> to do that instead.

Thanks, installed on the master branch (after applying the necessary
fix).

Closing the bug.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]