bug#63191: closed ([PATCH] website: posts: Fix typos in Dissecting Guix, Part 2: The Store Monad.)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 19 May 2023 17:29:36 +0200
with message-id <87v8gowd9b.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#63191: [PATCH] website: posts: Fix typos in Dissecting 
Guix, Part 2: The Store Monad.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #63191,
regarding [PATCH] website: posts: Fix typos in Dissecting Guix, Part 2: The 
Store Monad.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
63191: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=63191
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> [PATCH] website: posts: Fix typos in Dissecting Guix, Part 2: The Store Monad.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 30 Apr 2023 18:22:17 +0200
>
>
>
>
> * website/posts/dissecting-guix-2-store-monad.md: Fix typos.
> ---
>
> Missing `we'. I've also tweaked one code example, since the output in the
> blogpost did not match the code. Probably just a typo.
>
>  website/posts/dissecting-guix-2-store-monad.md | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/website/posts/dissecting-guix-2-store-monad.md 
> b/website/posts/dissecting-guix-2-store-monad.md
> index cd48d3e..da512ee 100644
> --- a/website/posts/dissecting-guix-2-store-monad.md
> +++ b/website/posts/dissecting-guix-2-store-monad.md
> @@ -169,8 +169,8 @@ First of all, we'll revert to our original definitions of 
> `remove-a` and
>        (nothing)))
>  ```
>  
> -What if tried introducing higher-order procedures (procedures that accept other
> -procedures as arguments) into the equation?  Because we're functional
> +What if we tried introducing higher-order procedures (procedures that accept
> +other procedures as arguments) into the equation?  Because we're functional
>  programmers and we have an unhealthy obsession with that sort of thing.
>  
>  ```scheme
> @@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ expressions to symbols, and are essentially equivalent to a 
> chain of
>  ;; This is equivalent...
>  (mlet* %maybe-monad ((str -> "abad") ;non-monadic binding uses the -> symbol
>                       (str1 (remove-a str))
> -                     (str2 (remove-b str)))
> -  (remove-a str))
> +                     (str2 (remove-b str1)))
> +  (remove-a str2))
>  ⇒ #<<maybe> is?: #t value: "d">
>  
>  ;; ...to this:
> @@ -330,9 +330,9 @@ expressions to symbols, and are essentially equivalent to a 
> chain of
>         (lambda (str)
>           (remove-a str))
>         (lambda (str1)
> -         (remove-b str))
> +         (remove-b str1))
>         (lambda (str2)
> -         (remove-a str))))
> +         (remove-a str2))))
>  ```
>  
>  Various abstractions over these two exist too, such as `mwhen` (a `when` plus 
> an
> -- 
> 2.39.2
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#63191: [PATCH] website: posts: Fix typos in Dissecting Guix, Part 2: The Store Monad.
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 19 May 2023 17:29:36 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Wolf <wolf@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
>
> > * website/posts/dissecting-guix-2-store-monad.md: Fix typos.
>
> Applied, thank you!
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
> --- End Message ---