--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: atkmm@2.28: Update to 2.28.3. |
|
Date: |
Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:59:55 +0100 |
* gnu/packages/gtk.scm (atkmm-2.28): Update to 2.28.3.
---
gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
index f88ab930d5..0c0aec6403 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm
@@ -1788,7 +1788,7 @@ (define-public atkmm-2.28
(package
(inherit atkmm)
(name "atkmm")
- (version "2.28.1")
+ (version "2.28.3")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch)
@@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ (define-public atkmm-2.28
(version-major+minor version) "/"
name "-" version ".tar.xz"))
(sha256
- (base32 "1b8vycqzr3lfvk2l73f4kk74hj48081zbh9r1r2ilr3h8xh7cs0i"))))
+ (base32 "0scricjx6p7acxrxmj232d6qi42zdkjh90xila6vw2d9hss8h83w"))))
(propagated-inputs
(modify-inputs (package-propagated-inputs atkmm)
(replace "glibmm" glibmm-2.64)))))
base-commit: 1cd97066c2dc84c6e538cfa63820e18f6c12a414
prerequisite-patch-id: e8b6782eaa5783cfc6ed74633ca8bfca5fd22715
prerequisite-patch-id: 5bbc8b4dbe8adefcc2d17b5e8b8f74779b084479
--
2.41.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug#68344] [PATCH gnome-team 2/2] gnu: font-abattis-cantarell: Update to 0.303.1. |
|
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2024 15:40:48 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> Am Dienstag, dem 09.01.2024 um 11:43 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Vivien Kraus <vivien@planete-kraus.eu> writes:
>>
>> > Le mardi 09 janvier 2024 à 12:46 +0100, Vivien Kraus a écrit :
>> > > * gnu/packages/fonts.scm (font-abattis-cantarell): Update to
>> > > 0.303.1.
>> > > [source]: Use the provided mirror tarball.
>> >
>> > The mirror tells me 0.303.1 has been uploaded on “2021-Dec-10”,
>> > while our commit is from 2023-Apr-4, so this is not an update at
>> > all. I’m not sure we should apply this one.
>>
>> What happened? Did 'guix refresh' get things wrong? Perhaps ask in
>> the #gnome channel if it's not clear from their repository.
> Seconded, the cantarell font in our repos is probably recent enough.
I just checked in the git repo, our commit is (much) newer. Closing,
since the second patch was submitted by Liliana earlier.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
--- End Message ---