emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#68190: closed ([GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed)


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#68190: closed ([GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:48:09 +0000

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:47:08 -0700
with message-id <202401312247.40VMl8Jk001273@freefriends.org>
and subject line Re: bug#68119: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #68119,
regarding [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
68119: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68119
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 04:09:23 +0000
Karl,

92 tests fail on 1.16j

Erik




> On Dec 31, 2023, at 3:18 PM, Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Erik - thanks for the follow-up. Now I understand. You were testing
> automake-1.16.5. But you sent it so soon after we released a pretest, I
> didn't notice, and thought you were testing the pretest :).
>
> These test failures (among lots of other things) are supposedly fixed in
> the current sources. Could you easily test
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.16j.tar.xz__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!pZ6_FkXW-_xJQ_Wj2_fHW89u9tG6I-8M19IL6SdqSha6C1-YenRgi1nps9gHwrn0PMD34_554_GB0qAg$
> ?
>
> No need to install it, just ./configure && make && make -j8 check;
> for whatever value of "8" you like :). --thanks, karl.

Attachment: test-suite.log.zip
Description: test-suite.log.zip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#68119: [GNU automake 1.16.5] test-suite 45 tests failed Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:47:08 -0700
Erik, I think all the automake test problems you reported here have been
resolved (thanks to your excellent debugging). So closing. Leaving
#68808 open until Zack or I have a chance to look into testing of make
for the subsecond mtimes. Thanks again! -k


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]