--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
[PATCH 00/12] Update fmt. |
|
Date: |
Fri, 4 Nov 2022 18:02:16 +0000 |
All dependent packages successfully build except for the already failing
fcitx5-gtk4-5.0.9 and hyperledger-iroha-1.1.1.
The packages dependent on fmt-8 fail to build against the new version of
fmt, even when upgraded.
solidity (dependent on fmt-for-solidity) fails to build against fmt-8,
even when upgraded.
Greg Hogan (12):
gnu: Add fmt-8.
gnu: zxing-cpp: Pin fmt version.
gnu: osm2pgsql: Pin fmt version.
gnu: openimageio: Pin fmt version.
gnu: opendht: Pin fmt version.
gnu: ceph: Pin fmt version.
gnu: spdlog: Update to 1.11.0.
gnu: waybar: Update to 0.9.15.
gnu: blender: Update to 3.3.1.
gnu: libmatroska: Update to 1.7.1.
gnu: mkvtoolnix: Update to 71.1.0.
gnu: fmt: Update to 9.1.0.
gnu/packages/aidc.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/geo.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/graphics.scm | 6 +++---
gnu/packages/logging.scm | 4 ++--
gnu/packages/networking.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/pretty-print.scm | 16 ++++++++++++++--
gnu/packages/storage.scm | 2 +-
gnu/packages/video.scm | 17 ++++++++++-------
gnu/packages/wm.scm | 4 ++--
9 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.38.0
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
|
Subject: |
Re: [bug#59020] [PATCH 00/12] Update fmt. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Mar 2024 14:25:41 -0500 |
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 2:26 AM Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> wrote:
>
>
> Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com> writes:
>
> > All dependent packages successfully build except for the already failing
> > fcitx5-gtk4-5.0.9 and hyperledger-iroha-1.1.1.
>
> Thanks for working on this Greg. I happened to look here
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/59020 and that suggests that there may be
> some dependent packages that fail to build.
>
> This is the list:
>
>
> https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/compare/package-derivations?base_commit=31e46e71e07fe272626da6c3e2a90d02a02b2b47&target_commit=1c7de64a27905a59f326cf6a334f61862f00484b&system=i686-linux&target=none&build_change=broken
>
> In particular, mpd stood out to me.
>
> Does that match up with what you're seeing locally?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
This issue is still listed as open at
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59020 even though Chris sent this response
to 59020-done (and I received the "closed" email). So I will attempt a
second closing of this issue.
Greg
--- End Message ---