emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#67485: closed ([Cuirass] Workers not waking up after server went awa


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: bug#67485: closed ([Cuirass] Workers not waking up after server went away)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:40:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:38:22 +0200
with message-id <87ttf3fz3l.fsf@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#67485: [Cuirass] Workers not waking up after server 
went away
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67485,
regarding [Cuirass] Workers not waking up after server went away
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
67485: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67485
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: [Cuirass] Workers not waking up after server went away Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:28:41 +0100 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Hello,

The ‘cuirass remote-worker’ processes (1.2.0-1.bdc1f9f) didn’t wake up
after ‘cuirass remote-server’ stopped responding earlier today,
remaining stuck while waiting for a reply to their latest “request work”
message:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Nov 27 02:47:30 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: derivation 
`/gnu/store/acljcvz7wb3pc9bxipkl1vf74ac7ns2z-calf-0.90.3.drv' build failed: 
build o
Nov 27 02:47:30 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: request work.
Nov 27 02:47:30 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: derivation 
`/gnu/store/z51fxy3j476136wcqd5gmy9v9r2vyqwn-csdr-0.18.2.drv' build failed: 
build o
Nov 27 02:47:30 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: request work.
Nov 27 02:47:44 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:47:44 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:48:44 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:48:44 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:49:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:49:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:50:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:50:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:51:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:51:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:52:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:52:45 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:53:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:53:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:54:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:54:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:55:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:55:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:55:53 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: worker's alive
Nov 27 02:56:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:56:46 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: HKCtyhxH: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
Nov 27 02:57:47 guixp9 cuirass[22122]: COhE8Mw6: ping tcp://10.0.0.1:5555.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

They had to be manually restarted.

This shouldn’t be the case.  Instead, they should say “received
bootstrap message” when the new ‘cuirass remote-server’ is spawned and
keep going.

Ludo’.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#67485: [Cuirass] Workers not waking up after server went away Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:38:22 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> skribis:

> The ‘cuirass remote-worker’ processes (1.2.0-1.bdc1f9f) didn’t wake up
> after ‘cuirass remote-server’ stopped responding earlier today,
> remaining stuck while waiting for a reply to their latest “request work”
> message:

I believe this is fixed.  In particular, Cuirass commit
fdb6bdfa27d9da8d052ed76b6a05b3817ff19777 added a timeout waiting for
“request work” replies.

Ludo’.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]