[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS
From: |
Pavel Janík |
Subject: |
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2001 17:41:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50 |
From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
Date: 14 Oct 2001 21:37:28 +0900
> I can understand why it might be good to put the doc-strings inside of
> comments (e.g., no annoying \n\ at the end of every line)
I think that the main reason to do that is that some functions have long
doc-string (>2048) and thus are twice in the sources. Once without
doc-string and once with it. The second DEFUN is/was (I haven't looked yet)
inside comment.
--
Pavel Janík
How the h*ll did you happen to actually notice this?
-- Linus Torvalds in linux-kernel
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, (continued)
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/15
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Miles Bader, 2001/10/16
- Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/10/16
Re: DOC_STRINGS_IN_COMMENTS,
Pavel Janík <=