[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c |
Date: |
01 Feb 2002 21:31:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
> Any comment/objection on the patch below ?
>
> It makes C-h c and C-k report
>
> foo (translated from bar)
>
> instead of just `foo' when the translated key sequence `foo' is not the same
> as the raw sequence `bar'. Examples:
>
> M-u (translated from M-U) runs the command upcase-word
> or
> DEL (translated from <backspace>) runs the command scroll-down
> or
> <f1> a (translated from ESC O P a) runs the command apropos-command
>
> I find `translated from' a bit awkward and longish, so any other idea
> is welcome.
Is this really necessary?
I think this will be more confusing than helpful (most of the time).
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Questions round session management., Richard Stallman, 2002/02/01
- Re: Questions round session management., Tak Ota, 2002/02/01
- Re: Questions round session management., Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/01
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/01
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/02
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/02
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/03
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/10
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/11
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/04
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/04
- Re: Raw keys in C-h k and C-h c, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/04