[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:26:18 +0100 |
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:07:55 -0700 (MST), Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
wrote:
> The new text would be somewhat longer and that might be inconvenient.
If pixels are so scarce, "(IELM on buffer-name)" could be
"(IELM:buffer-name)". I bet buffer names aren't usually so large as to
make any difference, and IELM buffers usually don't have minor modes
active, so there's (relatively) plenty of space.
Any more input from other IELM users?
/L/e/k/t/u
- ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Kim F. Storm, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/28
- Re: ielm working buffer on the modeline, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/28