[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unify on encoding
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Unify on encoding |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 07:23:45 -0500 |
>
> On 19 Mar 2002, Jason Rumney wrote:
>
> > The escape route would be to select an iso2022 or emacs-mule coding
> > system from the expanded list offered. Or do those get unified as well?
>
> I don't know; I didn't yet have time to try this mode. Perhaps Stefan
> can answer that.
>
> In general, iso-2022 tags each charset with a special escape sequence, so
> at least in principle, you could have, say, latin-2 characters retagged
> as latin-1 there. But I don't know if that actually happens.
No, as I said, any char that can be encoded by a coding-system will be
encoded just as it was before. The only difference is now some coding
systems can encode more chars than before.
Stefan
- Unify on encoding, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/17
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/18
- Re: Unify on encoding, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/18
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/18
- Re: Unify on encoding, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/19
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/19
- Re: Unify on encoding, Jason Rumney, 2002/03/19
- Re: Unify on encoding, Stefan Monnier, 2002/03/19
- Re: Unify on encoding, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/03/20
- Re: Unify on encoding,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: Unify on encoding, Richard Stallman, 2002/03/18