[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:57:14 -0600 (MDT) |
It uses high-numbered "minor-minor" numbers (which I think is a good
idea), but the "minor" number of the pretest is plain wrong!
It would perhaps be logical to use negative minor-minor version numbers.
I wonder if that would break anything. We could try it.
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05