[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *Occur in buf*?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: *Occur in buf*? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:54:58 -0600 (MDT) |
> I know, but the idea was to rename the occur buffer automatically to
> include the name of the original buffer. E.g. *Occur: xdisp.c* .
TRT, IMO, is to make `generate-new-buffer-name' mode-specific.
E.g., have a buffer-local variable 'uniquify-buffer-name' or a similar
property of the major-mode name, which would hold a mode-specific
function which is to be run in the buffer being renamed.
This could be a reasonable idea. Do people agree that there
is a particular "right" behavior for any given mode?
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, (continued)
Re: *Occur in buf*?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/26
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Benjamin Rutt, 2002/07/26
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/27
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/27
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/29
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/31
Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/28
RE: *Occur in buf*?, Marshall, Simon, 2002/07/25
RE: *Occur in buf*?, Marshall, Simon, 2002/07/29