[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \201 back again
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: \201 back again |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:39:08 -0400 |
As for the encoding, it says this:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
So the question now is how come Richard's Emacs sent such a badly
encoded message, and why did it think it was in UTF-8 when in fact it
was in emacs-mule?
I don't know where the Content-Type field came from, but certainly not
from Emacs. sendmail.el doesn't know about them.
As for the strangeness of the encoding, I think that is coming from
the Emacs on fencepost that I am using to finally send my mail.
I should build the latest Emacs and use that instead.
- Re: \201 back again, (continued)
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, ShengHuo ZHU, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/09/21
- Re: \201 back again, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/22
- Re: \201 back again, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/22
- Re: \201 back again, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/23
- Re: \201 back again,
Richard Stallman <=