[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 06:39:54 +0200 (IST) |
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> > If you cannot work around this, perhaps we should require Bash on
> > Windows 9X?
>
> Hmm, that would be tantamount to requiring cygwin/mingw tools. I'd
> rather not.
It's painful, but if that's the only reasonable way to do that on Windows
9X, I don't see why we should drop the idea. It's certainly better than
to tell that bootstrap is impossible on Windows 9X.
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, (continued)
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/24
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/25
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/30
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/28
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Stefan Monnier, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/29
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Richard Stallman, 2002/09/29