[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:15:42 -0400 |
> * Foo: (foo)bar. The GNU Foo program.
> vs
> * Foo: (foo)baz. The One and Only GNU FooBar program.
>
> No, these definitely should not be merged, IMHO. bar != baz.
But note that `m Foo RET' will ignore the second one.
As said, it might still be usable by middle-clicking on it, but it's
still rather bogus overall anyway. Which is why I wouldn't object to
merging such entries.
> However, I think these can be merged:
> * Foo: (foo)bar. GNU Foo.
> * Foo: (foo)bar. The one and only GNU Foo.
> where only the commentary differs. It's a judgement call, but personally I
> think having one menu entry is better in this case, because it's fewer
> entries in the dir file. Most likely one or the other them will be the
> older commentary, so why bother having it?
Agreed.
Stefan
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, (continued)
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/01
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/01
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/01
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/01
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/01
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/02
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/02
- Re: Emacs cvs newbie problems, Karl Berry, 2002/10/02