[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22 |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:40:52 -0400 |
> A good alternative would be to encode each message as what
> the charset= header says (and add/fix such a header if there is none, or
> if the one that's there lies).
>
> Paul, what do you think of this idea?
mbox format was chosen because it is standard, so whatever we
do, it is important that it works with other programs.
That probably means that the format should be "whatever was received".
I.e. the mail-reader should never encode anything (only the mail-sender
should do that).
Stefan
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, (continued)
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Dave Love, 2002/10/15
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/18
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/21
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kai Großjohann, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/22
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Kenichi Handa, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Paul Michael Reilly, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/23
- Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/24