Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22

[Kai Großjohann]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> Personally, I think emacs-mule is not a good idea in this case, since 
> mbox is not Emacs-private format, so some other software should be able 
> to read it.  A good alternative would be to encode each message as what 
> the charset= header says (and add/fix such a header if there is none, or 
> if the one that's there lies).

Maybe "encode" is a bit misleading in this case, as the bytes in the
message are not changed (modulo adding/fixing the Content-Type
header).

It's more the case that the message that's displayed is _de_coded for
viewing, right?

kai
-- 
~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn    (Frank Nobis)