[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent
From: |
Bill Wohler |
Subject: |
Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:48:39 -0700 |
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
> Release 21.3 is a maintenance release from the 21.1 release branch.
>
> Release 21.4 is to be released from the CVS trunk which is still not
> in feature freeze, so currently it would be ok to update mh-e on the
> trunk.
Ah, that explains a lot.
> > This is a major minor release
>
> A major minor release :-)
So you noticed ;-). In addition to all of the new features, we also
took pains to get mh-e to compile cleanly. It now also passes checkdoc
cleanly, except for some old boolean variables that don't end in
-flag. We'd like to fix those up before committing to Emacs and reduce
the user exposure to the change, and obviously bump the major version
to reflect that change (7.0).
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> You can update mh-e fully whenever you like.
Thank you. Will do. Expect a version 7.0 that will be more robust than
6.2 would have been by the end of November or so.
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.
- mh-e 6.2 imminent, Bill Wohler, 2002/10/21
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/21
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/21
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent,
Bill Wohler <=
- checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/24
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25