[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: idledo.el v. 0.3
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: idledo.el v. 0.3 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:19:36 -0500 |
> This is a useful feature, but why not use pre-command-hook directly?
Because the pre-command-hook is called for all command - also when
emacs hasn't been idle; that seems highly wasteful to me.
timer-no-longer-idle-hook would be added complexity and a possible
optimization. So the question is, how much slowdown does it avoid?
Is the optimization sufficient to be worth one more feature?
- Re: idledo.el v. 0.3, (continued)
Re: idledo.el v. 0.3, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25