[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent)
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:22:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:19:13AM +0100, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> Try to find all uses of the region and mouse faces... I bet that you
> get numerous false hits that you wouldn't have got had they been named
> region-face and mouse-face.
Because of the property I've already noted -- that uses of constant faces
almost always occur in contexts where the use of a face is _explicit_,
e.g. accompanying a variable or function called `...-face' -- I can do this:
grep "face.*'region" ...
which in fact works quite well.
One way you can test this is to pick some existing face called `foo-face',
and grep for both "foo-face" and "face.*foo" in the sources. It's best to
pick a face that _doesn't_ have an identically-named variable, because
otherwise you tend to get lots of false hits in the `foo-face' case
[this is a problem, incidentally, with faces like `foo-face' -- code such as
font-lock tends to be even more confusing because there are _identical_
symbols being used for both variables and faces, in ways that are not that
easy to distinguish at first glance; I think it would actually be _more_
clear if only the variables were called `foo-face']
Here's an example:
First using the `-face' suffix:
grep -nH "gnus-cite-attribution-face" lisp/gnus/*.el
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:126:(defface gnus-cite-attribution-face '((t
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:130:(defcustom gnus-cite-attribution-face
'gnus-cite-attribution-face
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:317:corresponding citation merged with
`gnus-cite-attribution-face'.
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:367: (gnus-cite-add-face number skip
gnus-cite-attribution-face))
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:375: (gnus-cite-add-face number skip
gnus-cite-attribution-face)))))
Now without it:
grep -nH "face.*gnus-cite-attribution" lisp/gnus/*.el
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:126:(defface gnus-cite-attribution-face '((t
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:130:(defcustom gnus-cite-attribution-face
'gnus-cite-attribution-face
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:367: (gnus-cite-add-face number skip
gnus-cite-attribution-face))
lisp/gnus/gnus-cite.el:375: (gnus-cite-add-face number skip
gnus-cite-attribution-face)))))
Note that the second catches all the same cases except a mention in a
doc-string.
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), (continued)
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/25
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/26
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Henrik Enberg, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent),
Miles Bader <=
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/28
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Henrik Enberg, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Miles Bader, 2002/10/25
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Peter S Galbraith, 2002/10/29