[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Jun 2003 11:24:27 +0000 (UTC) |
address@hidden (David Kastrup) wrote:
I was giving an example for a user interface. What Emacs has nowadays
does not really deserve that name.
But that particular kind of user interface is not the only kind that
exists. Emacs provides two excellent user interfaces. However,
neither are the kind you are talking about. (I agree that Emacs is
missing that kind.)
My point is that there are several different kinds of user interface.
It is misleading to say that
.... an example for a user interface. What Emacs has nowadays
does not really deserve that name.
because that suggests that Emacs lacks a decent user interface.
On the contrary, Emacs provides two really good user interfaces that
should not be devalued:
* a user interface for people who are permanently or situationally
blind (Emacs does), and,
* a user interface for people who desire to change more than three
bindings at one time efficiently and who are willing to spend
time, but less than the time of doing it awkwardly, learning how
to do this.
I agree that Emacs could do better to also provide a user interface
for people who are sighted and who do not want to learn a more
efficent technique, but it is a mistake to write as if that particular
kind of user interface is the only worthy kind.
> But at the same time, Emacs should also provide ...
This is a somewhat orthogonal aim. I don't see why one should make
the availability of one user interface depend on that of another.
I am not saying we should make one depend on another. I am saying
that a user interface for the blind is important, as is a user
interface for those who desire to work with computers comfortably,
quickly, and efficiently. And neither of these two kinds of user
interface should be relegated to the near invisible status of a notion
that does `not really deserve [a] name.'
--
Robert J. Chassell Rattlesnake Enterprises
http://www.rattlesnake.com GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.teak.cc address@hidden
- Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs?,
Robert J. Chassell <=