If memory serves, I tried this on the cvs of May 18, and had the
problem on that one also.
I might comment that the logic in that part of the code is very
complicated -- perhaps it should be broken out a bit at the cost of
some cpu cycles, but less human cycles.
on Monday 06/02/2003 Lars Hansen(address@hidden) wrote
> I have a fix ready. But before I send it, I want to investigate the
> reason for the change that has just been made to desktop.el (revision
> 1.56), it is wrong.
>
> Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> >This may have resulted from your changes--could you please investigate?
> >