[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:31:09 -0400 |
> > I don't understand what's the problem. How many users currently
> > actively use node names ? From what I can tell, these seem to be mostly
> > used internally, much like URLs in HTML.
>
> I'm not sure that's true. The `g' command, for example, accepts node
> names (with completion) and is an effective way of going if you know
I never claimed it was true, if you read what I wrote.
I'm genuinely asking how important it is. I'm by far the most
sophisticated user of `info' among the few people I know around here
and I never use `g' other than to visit a particular info *file*
(which is why I added completion inside the (...) ;-).
Stefan
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Karl Berry, 2003/06/04
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Miles Bader, 2003/06/04
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/04
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/05
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/05
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/06
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Andreas Schwab, 2003/06/06
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/06
- Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/05