[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?
From: |
Robin Hu |
Subject: |
How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls? |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jun 2003 03:21:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi everyone:
Current CVS NtEmacs snapshot loads libjpeg.dll in runtime. This
causes a problem while I have some different versions of libjpeg.dll
in %PATH%, because these versions are not binary compatible. And
this problems can not be easily get rid of, because NtEmacs tries to
load this dll via several names, such as libjpeg.dll jpeg-62.dll. We
are in the hell of dlls now.
I suggest to use static link instead of dynamic loaded dll files, or
even more, include source files of these image libraries
directly. This should be helpful to avoid dll hell, and may also
helpful to workaround VC's bug in compiling w32fns.c(this bug will
not re-produced while compiling w32fns.c with intel c compiler, so I
believe this is a bug of VC itself).
I've planned to do this, and I'd like to know if this is an
acceptable idea before I really start doing this.
robin.hu
- How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?,
Robin Hu <=
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Mike Woolley, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Robin Hu, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/06/05
- Re: How about using static link instead of dynamic loaded dlls?, Juanma Barranquero, 2003/06/05