[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: malloc and alignment
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: malloc and alignment |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:47:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 07:17:38PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Indeed. And `memalign' is not a standard function anyway, so we
> need to provide a fallback implementation anyway.
It's `kinda' standard, in the sense that more than glibc implements it; posix
("1003.1d" no clue what that is) apparently specifies a version with
identical functionality but a wackier interface, called `posix_memalign',
which glibc also implements.
-Miles
--
[|nurgle|] ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that
will make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth?
[iddt] nurg, that's the goal
- Re: malloc and alignment, (continued)
Re: malloc and alignment, Miles Bader, 2003/06/16
Re: malloc and alignment, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/06/17
Message not available