Re: utf-8 cjk translation bug?

[Jason Rumney]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> > Yeah, that's definitely the case, and it's not just a problem with
> > double-width characters -- the coverage of many iso10646 fonts seems
> > completely crap.
> 
> BTW, does this mean that the new unicode emacs will have problems
> rendering many charsets that are currently displayed properly by emacs?

I'm sure Handa-san can confirm for sure, but unicode Emacs has a
new function x_get_font_repertory which seems to deal with this
situation.