[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: windows-1251 language environment
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: windows-1251 language environment |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:40:12 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Inheritance of language environments could be a useful idea,
> but I am not sure how much it would save. Consider this one:
[...]
> We could make it shorter using inheritance, but it is already pretty
> short; is it really worth while making it any shorter?
The purpose of inheritance is not only to make it shorter.
With inheritance, users can make a new lang. env. easily by
inheriting the one that matches best to his purpose.
Another way is to make a new lang. env. by copying an
existing one.
With inheritance, the change to parent affects lang. envs
inheritting it. With copying, no. So, purhaps both method
is useful (as well as the case of face).
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, (continued)
Re: windows-1251 language environment, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/08
- Re: windows-1251 language environment,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/09
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Dave Love, 2003/10/12
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/13
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/14
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/15
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/15
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/16
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/16
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/17
- Re: windows-1251 language environment, Dave Love, 2003/10/21